In systems development, ensuring its correctness and reliability is paramount. Two key processes, verification and validation, play critical roles in this pursuit. Often mistakenly, used interchangeably, these terms have distinct meanings, each with its significance in the development lifecycle. To truly understand their importance, it’s essential to understand their differences and how they contribute to the quality assurance process.
You may find a few definitions, which vary slightly. The International Council on Systems Engineering (INCOSE) defines these therms as:
- Verification is the confirmation, through the provision of objective evidence, that specified requirements have been fulfilled
- Validation is the confirmation, through the provision of objective evidence, that the requirements for a specific intended use or application have been fulfilled.
On the other hand, The Project Management Institute says in the PMBOK guide:
- Verification – the evaluation of whether or not a product, service, or result complies with a regulation, requirement, specification, or imposed condition.
- Validation – the assurance that a product, service, or result meets the needs of the customer and other identified stakeholders
Let us translate these formal definitions into an everyday language.
Imagine a clock (such as the one in this article) – a meticulously crafted mechanism comprising numerous cogs and gears. Each cog must be precisely positioned and function seamlessly with others to ensure the clock accurately tells time. Now, envision that same clock, not just as a collection of parts but as a functional timekeeping device hanging on a wall, serving its purpose flawlessly.
Verification: Ensuring the Clock’s Cogs are in Place
Verification focuses on confirming that a system meets its design specifications and requirements. It involves examining the system at various stages of development to ensure each component behaves as intended. Let us go back to our clock analogy. Verification would involve meticulously inspecting each cog, ensuring they are the correct size, shape, and material specified in the design blueprint.
In practice, verification encompasses a range of activities such as design reviews, components testing, and static analysis. These methods aim to catch defects early in development, preventing them from snowballing into more significant issues downstream. By rigorously verifying each component against predetermined criteria, developers can confidently believe the system is built correctly.
However, more than verification is required to guarantee a system’s success. While it ensures that the cogs are in place, it doesn’t guarantee that the clock will keep accurate time.
Validation: Ensuring the Clock Tells Time
Validation, on the other hand, focuses on assessing whether the system meets the needs and expectations of its stakeholders. It involves evaluating the system’s functionality to ensure it fulfils its intended purpose. In our clock analogy, validation would involve hanging the clock on the wall, observing its behaviour over time, and confirming that it tells time with the required accuracy under real-world conditions.
Validation activities often include user acceptance testing, system integration testing, and performance testing. These tests simulate real-world scenarios to verify that the system behaves as expected in its operational environment. By validating the system against user needs and requirements, developers can ensure that it delivers tangible value and meets the intended objectives.
Bringing it Together
While verification and validation are distinct processes, they are complementary and equally essential in ensuring the quality of a system (also abbreviated as V&V). Verification confirms that the system is built correctly, while validation confirms that the right system is built.
In practice, a holistic approach combining verification and validation is crucial for achieving high-quality systems. Still, the logical sequence of actions is to perform the verification steps first and then to carry out the validation steps. It is doubtful that a system with internal issues works as intended.
By integrating continuous verification and validation throughout the development lifecycle, organisations can mitigate risks, reduce overall development costs, and deliver products that meet customer expectations. In today’s rapidly evolving technological landscape, where systems are becoming increasingly complex and interconnected, the importance of verification and validation cannot be overstated. The consequences of failure can be severe, from autonomous vehicles to medical devices to financial systems.
Conclusion
In conclusion, verification and validation are two sides of the same coin, each playing a vital role in ensuring the quality of systems. Like the cogs in a clock, verification ensures every component is in place, while validation confirms that the clock accurately tells time.
Other words:
- Verification leads to building the system right.
- Validation leads to building the right system.
Systerion is a professional consulting and service provider in systems engineering and management.
Our experts will support you in systematically analysing your technical or business case. We will also guide you in turning your needs into the solution design ready for an optimised, cost-efficient implementation.
